<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/">
<title>Tastings</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2005-02-05T22:21:59-05:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.121" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000202.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000200.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000162.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000161.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000151.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000149.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000148.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000143.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000142.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000138.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000130.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000129.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000121.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000120.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000119.html" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000202.html">
<title>Starbucks Chantico</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000202.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I tried out this new 'drinking chocolate' monstrosity at (shudder) Starbucks, 'Chantico,' after my usual postmodern deathmatch linguistic throwdown:<br />
<p><br />
"Yeah, let me have a large Chantico please."<br />
<p><br />
"Venti?"<br />
<p><br />
"Big.  Biggest you have."<br />
<p><br />
<em>-silence-</em> "...well, it comes in these six-ounce cups..."<br />
<p><br />
"Okay, then why did you ask if I wanted that word that I won't deign to repeat if it's not available in the first place?"<br />
<p><br />
"...sir?"<br />
<p><br />
"Gimme.  And shut up."<br />
<p><br />
Yes, I'm like that until I've had my coffee or other stimulant.  If I had a <a href="http://www.transmetropolitan.com">bowel disruptor</a>, it'd be on <em>steaming rectal volcano</em> and some son of a bitch would pay.<br />
<p><br />
So anyhow, Chantico.  This is how chocolate was supposed to be drunk, originally.  This is how you get chocolate if you wander into a small <em>stube</em> in Wien and ask for it.  The only problem is that this is the United States, and the franchise ghetto to boot.  So, of course, there's enough sugar in this concoction to stun a pre-teen child who is terminally addicted to Twinkies.  I really think this could be tasty if they just yanked like 4/5 of the sugar out of it and maybe added some alcohol.  Okay, I'd be willing to add the booze myself.  But for God's sake, the sugar, man.  Get fucking rid of it.  Like, now.  I could run Hershey PA for a day at least on one six-ounce cup of this stuff.  It's like one of the M&M Guys had diarrhea into my goddamn cup.<br />
<p></p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Sweets</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>jbz</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2005-02-05T22:21:59-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000200.html">
<title>Imperial Tea Keemun Hao Ya</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000200.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Tiny rolled leaves and a malty aroma distinguish this tea before preparation.  It brews to a dark amber, profoundly red at its deepest point.  The flavor is bold and slightly smoky, but it tastes most of malt.  There are some very subtle floral notes and an extremely long finish.</p>

<p>If you are looking for a very bold, smooth, and malty tea, this may be the one for you.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Tea</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2005-02-03T09:20:38-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000162.html">
<title>THE MONTANERO</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000162.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ah.  The sheer overthetoppedness of it all.<br />
<p><br />
The Montanero (I cannot produce the corrent ligature, my apologies) is available from Izzy's Sub Shop.  If you don't know where that is, my condolences.  It consists of a lunch plate, for $8.50, which comes with all manner of yum, most of it VERY BAD FOR YOU:  Beefsteak w/onions, twice-fried pork, sweet plantains, rice and beans and a fried egg on top (just to cap the spectacle).<br />
<p><br />
Carbolestorolafatty goodness.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Food</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>jbz</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-11-01T12:43:56-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000161.html">
<title>Farmer&apos;s Market Sandwich (Beantowne)</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000161.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Farmer's Market sandwich from Beantowne Coffee House is a pleasing addition to any cold-weather snackage.  It goes well with the astringency of coffee; it adds weight to the warmth of soup, and it can make the difference between 'bite' and 'lunch.'  Available on a variety of breads, it contains:<br />
<ul><br />
<li>Chicken Salad (storemade, they claim)<br />
<li>Cheddar cheese (mmm)<br />
<li>Granny Smith Apple slices (tartness)<br />
<li>Walnuts<br />
<li>Some form of greenery.<br />
</ul><br />
It is available in half- or full-size.  Recommended when you're grabbing coffee or coffee/soup or whatever.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Food</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>jbz</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-11-01T12:40:47-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000151.html">
<title>Salentein Malbec Mendoza 2001</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000151.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Valle de Uco, Tunuyán, Mendoza, Argentina</p>

<p>With a scent of plum and smoke, this wine is a velvety purple.  The taste is similarly of plum, with the smoke coming to the foreground.  It's very smooth.  The finish is almost a little bitter.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Wine</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-10-17T22:59:46-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000149.html">
<title>Duck Walk Vineyards Vidal Blanc Ice Wine</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000149.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>We spent a weekend in the <a href="http://www.fingerlakeswinecountry.com/">Finger Lakes wine region</a>, where ice wines seem to be the current rage.  The area has particularly good Rieslings and early frosts - I think those two combine to make good conditions for ice wines.</p>

<p>It's a pity the only ice wine we tried was from the Hamptons, at <a href="http://www.duckwalk.com/">Duck Walk Vineyards</a>, but it was still quite nice.</p>

<p>It had an extremely rich, green apple nose.  I also detected a little pear.  The main flavors are apricot and honey, though there's a little apple in the finish.  Is was quite sweet - a great dessert wine.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Wine</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-10-15T23:22:20-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000148.html">
<title>Roderer Estate Anderson Valley Brut</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000148.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Quite dry, very carbonated.  The primary fruit flavor is grape, but I also taste some sour citrus.  This champagne is nothing spectacular, but it's nice enough.  After sitting a few minutes, it's a little malty.  But still primarily sour.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Wine</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-10-15T23:10:53-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000143.html">
<title>Heron Hill Winery Rieslings</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000143.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>After our trip to <a href="http://drfrankwines.com/">Dr. Frank's</a>, we went down the street to the <a href="http://heronhill.com">Heron Hill Winery</a>.  I tried three of their premium Rieslings.</p>

<p>All were excellent, but I wasn't taking notes, and I only remember a word or two to describe each.</p>

<p><a href="http://heronhill.com/wines_online/catalog.asp?TID=32&catID=14">Dry Riesling 2003</a>. Lots of citrus, particularly in the finish.  Primarily lime.</p>

<p>Johannesberg Riesling. Primarily lemon, more in the full flavor than just the finish.</p>

<p><a href="http://heronhill.com/wines_online/catalog.asp?TID=48&catID=17">Late Harvest Riesling 2002</a>.  Honey and orange, but mostly honey.  It has an almost syrupy consistency when compared with the other two.  Did I mention honey?</p>

<p>Our trip to the Finger Lakes wine region was very successful - there are definitely some excellent wines being produced in the area.  I'm going to head over to Marty's shortly to see what New York wineries they stock.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Wine</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-10-06T00:01:56-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000142.html">
<title>Dr. Konstantin Frank Vinifera Wine Cellars</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000142.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Elisabeth and I spent the weekend in Rochester, NY with some friends and visited a couple wineries.  The first was <a href="http://www.drfrankwines.com/">Dr. Konstantin Frank's Vinifera Wine Cellars</a>.  Their tasting is highly recommended - you get six choices between two similar wines, so if you pair up with a friend you can try twelve in total.</p>

<p>Here are a few short notes.  The links are to the closest matching year on their Wine Facts page:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.drfrankwines.com/drfwinefacts.html#chardonnay01">Dr. Frank's 2002 Chardonnay</a>.  Very oaky and dry.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.drfrankwines.com/drfwinefacts.html#salmonchard">Salmon Run 2002 Chardonnay</a>.  Sweeter than the Dr. Frank Chardonnay, not overly oaky.  Apples and pears.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.drfrankwines.com/drfwinefacts.html#salmonriesling">Salmon Run 2003 Riesling</a>.  Fruity aroma and flavor.  Sour notes at the back of the throat, but it's not unpleasant.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.drfrankwines.com/drfwinefacts.html#semidryriesling">Dr. Frank's 2003 Johannesberg Riesling "Semi-dry"</a>.  Rich, sweet.  Nice dessert wine.</p>

<p>Salmon Run Coho Red.  Thin and fruity - this is a great table wine.  It was highly recommended by our helpful tasting guide as a cooking wine.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.drfrankwines.com/drfwinefacts.html#pinotnoir01">Dr. Frank's 2001 Pinot Noir</a>.  Light flavor, floral but not overly sweet.  Well-layered.</p>

<p>Salmon Run 2002 Meritage.  Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc, Merlot.  It's aged in French oak barrels, and tastes peppery.  Nice.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.drfrankwines.com/drfwinefacts.html#cabfranc">Dr. Frank's 2002 Cabernet Franc</a>.  Nice, tastes of apple.</p>

<p>Dr. Frank's 2001 Merlot.  Very fruity, dry.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.drfrankwines.com/drfwinefacts.html#dryriesling">Dr. Frank's 2003 Riesling "Dry"</a>.  Great!  Tart, tastes like grapefruit.  We left with two bottles of this one.</p>

<p>Dr. Frank's 2002 Pinot Gris.  Light in flavor.  That's all my notes say.  What a waste of ink.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.drfrankwines.com/drfwinefacts.html#cabsauv2001">Dr. Frank's 2002 Cabernet Sauvignon</a>.  Very tannic.  Dry dry dry!  Lots of plum, tobacco.</p>

<p>The Dr. Frank branded wines are from grapes grown on-site.  Salmon Run is their newer, more inexpensive brand blending grapes from other vineyards.</p>

<p>All their wines were nice, and I can recommend them.  The notes were primarily to help me differentiate between them, and I'm sorry I don't have more detail.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Wine</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-10-05T23:36:02-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000138.html">
<title>Don Melchor Concha y Toro 2000</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000138.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Probably best in a year or so, but this Cabernet Sauvignon from Puente Alto, Chile has a wonderful personality -- blackberry and currant are most discernible -- and a nice balance.  I drank it without food, but if one were to enjoy an edible delight with it, I suspect it would pair wonderfully with various well seasoned ethnic dishes and anything but the gamiest of meats.</p>

<p>Disclaimer: I have heard that Wine Spectator gave this wine an impressive 94 rating, and unfortunately for the review I knew this a priori.  It would be hard not to enjoy this bad boy, though.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Wine</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>rml</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-09-26T21:19:37-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000130.html">
<title>Imperial Tea Everyday Green</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000130.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Dragon well vegetable taste, pleasantly bitter.  Crisp flavor.  The leaves aren't flat like a dragon well, but it definitely tastes like one.</p>

<p>A second infusion is also nice, just a slightly weaker version of the first.</p>

<p>This short review belies the excellence of this tea.  I like it a lot, and will definitely be keeping it around for daily drinking.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Tea</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-08-25T22:13:08-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000129.html">
<title>Tealuxe Sencha (Bin 174)</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000129.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Refreshingly bitter!</p>

<p>It's nice to have a tea that isn't so refined as to lose its bite in favor of smoothness or sweetness.</p>

<p>The color is a very pale green.  It has a crispness on the tongue and a full vegetable aroma that hits right at the bridge of the nose.  Unfortunately it loses its punch early - a second infusion is very weak.  It has a crispness on the tongue and a full vegetable aroma that hits right at the bridge of the nose.</p>

<p>This is a great tea for daily drinking.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Tea</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-08-25T22:08:13-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000121.html">
<title>Imperial Tea Imperial Green Oolong</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000121.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a very nice tea, easily my favourite of the green oolong sampler.  It isn't as sweet as the Dong Ding Oolong, and it's pleasantly bitter.  The nose is fresh and green, with a little spice.</p>

<p>It's a full, round flavoured tea, and is probably the closest thing at Imperial to the Tealuxe Jade Oolong I was trying to replace in the first place.</p>

<p>The second infusion is similar.  There's a little less bite, but the flavour still holds up well.  Same with a third - less bite, still less flavour, but it remains a good cup of tea.  It retains a surprising amount of colour for a third infusion.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-07-28T23:53:16-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000120.html">
<title>Imperial Tea Imperial Dong Ding Oolong</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000120.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Light olive in colour, this tea smells like it may be a little more full-flavoured than the Wen Shan Bao Zhong.  The flavour has apricot notes and a very full, sweet finish.  It's a very floral tea.</p>

<p>I think it's too sweet for me to drink daily.  Maybe a longer infusion would balance that out a bit.</p>

<p>It gets sweeter on further infusions.  You can get at least two out of this tea, probably three.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Tea</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-07-28T23:40:02-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000119.html">
<title>Imperial Tea Imperial Wen Shan Bao Zhong (Pouchong)</title>
<link>http://www.sharp-tools.net/tasting/archives/000119.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This tea has a light, green flavour.  It's a little sweet.  The nose and taste both have some floral notes.  Its colour is a pale jade.  Josh thinks it has a sour (not in a bad way) finish.</p>

<p>The second infusion is rounder and sweeter.  I think I'd like something with a little more bitterness for daily drinking, but this is an excellent green oolong.</p>

<p>This tea produced three infusions.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Tea</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-07-28T23:34:04-05:00</dc:date>
</item>


</rdf:RDF>