Or, of course, it could actually be a statement about what sort of viewpoints and employees they really want inside their company. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt, here.
Plus, does said exec realize he's talking about the senator that represents his corporate headquarters' state?
Addendum: in re: feedback - yes, I realize I do not much more than rant about politics here myself. I'd like to point out that on this blog I do not represent Novell, and no part of it is hosted on their machinery or network. Nor are statements I make here intended to convey Novell policy of any sort. This is a *critical* difference. If the Exec in question had made this statement in a personal venue, more power to him. He, however, made it while being interviewed by the press as 'Novell's CTO' - which is a vastly different thing.
Posted by jbz at August 22, 2006 11:11 AM
| TrackBack
Oh, sure. Just either way the company is fairly evil. ;)
Posted by: Luis at August 23, 2006 10:55 PMLuis-
Yes, I do realize that. However, again, there's a world of difference between contributing to a particular candidate and actively using the name of your corporate HQ's senator as an object of ridicule in a public statement.
You do realize Novell is one of Orrin Hatch's biggest corporate donors, right?
Posted by: Luis at August 22, 2006 8:28 PM